Oregon ballot measure would tax big corporations more, return revenue as rebate to residents

The measure would increase the corporate minimum or corporate income tax by 3% on sales above $25 million, which in turn would provide the Beaver State's 4 million people with an estimated $750 each, according to its chief proponent.

Gisbert added a second review by the Oregon government estimated the levy would collect $7 billion and raise the rebate to $1,600-per-Oregonian. In other comments, Gisbert said the new program would greatly reduce poverty in the state.

Lower-income residents could opt for a direct cash payment, according to another analysis.

"And when they do that, could you use about 1,600 bucks for yourself and every member of your household? Yeah. Fantastic. Vote yes."

Oregon Reps. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, a Republican, and Val Hoyle, a Democrat, joined Democratic Gov. Tina Kotek, and top Oregon corporation Nike in that regard, according to several reports.

Chavez-DeRemer said in August the new tax-and-rebate would cause statewide inflation and would be "the last thing our state needs right now."

"Join me in Voting no on Measure 118," she said.

In its own analysis, the Tax Foundation railed against the proposal, calculating that with the minimum gross-receipts tax of 3%, a qualifying company with profits running at 7% would face an effective 42% corporate income tax.

The only other state with anything remotely similar to the tax-to-rebate program is Alaska, which Gisbert cited in wanting to provide Oregonians a similar return.

For more than 40 years, Juneau has paid Alaskans a dividend of the state's revenue from oil and energy production. 

However, Alaska's dividend is not an additional levy on the oil industry, but a slice of the state's standardized revenue returned to the people.

Dunleavy has pushed for higher dividends for Alaskans while lambasting the federal government for continuing to attack oil and gas exploration in the Last Frontier, and thereby risking the dividend.