America’s New Female Right review - this lazy BBC documentary fails to tackle dangerously extreme views

I am going to go out on a limb and say that most Guardian readers who watch a BBC documentary called America's New Female Right are unlikely to be in accord with the views espoused therein. We are not going to empathise with statements such as: "Women getting the right to vote has led to every form of degeneracy," "Feminism was absolutely created to destabilise the family [and] western civilisation," and: "Feminism is a thousand times more toxic than the 'toxic masculinity' we hear so much about." We are unlikely to agree that "Satan's agenda" is to destroy the nuclear family structure in order to control society.

All these statements are uttered - with certainty and apparent sincerity - by women championing rightwing causes, often in a way that seems to run counter to what we would consider their best interests.

The presenter, Layla Wright, has three main interviewees. There is the online influencer Morgonn McMichael, 24, who says she wants only to be a stay-at-home wife and mother. She believes that encouraging women to move into the corporate world is to encourage them to go against "our inherent nature".

Third is Hannah Faulkner, 17, who came to her particular brand of fame three years ago when she organised a Teens Against Genital Mutilation rally in her native Nashville, Tennessee, supporting a ban on medical intervention for young transgender people. She is one of several siblings homeschooled by devoutly Christian parents - her father is a former pastor - and is increasingly embraced as a darling of the right.

There is so much to unpack with each of them (especially Faulkner). It's a fascinating subject that deserves attention and rigorous interrogation of all the factors at play, especially with subjects as bright, articulate and confident as these (again, especially Faulkner). What we get instead is a cheap, shoddy programme apparently thrown together in 10 minutes, presumably on the grounds that everything and everyone is so obviously awful and evil and bad-bad-bad that it is enough just to film them, show Wright's pained face occasionally and have her lob in a few wet questions to show that she is still listening and still on the side of right (which is, of course, left, not right).

Sinister music is played in certain scenes, in case we are in danger of forgetting which side "we" are on - all of us, without doubt, without question, without occasionally wondering if the "other side" might have half a point buried in there that might be worth pulling out and examining in the light.

It's so lazy. "Point and weep" documentaries are only half a step removed from the "point and laugh" kind that commissioners have supposedly left behind as we move into a more sensitive, sophisticated era.

If you are going to interview people such as McMichael, Hutcherson and Faulkner, you need a presenter who is capable and unafraid of going toe to toe with them. These are people with sincerely held beliefs. You need someone with the intellectual and temperamental firepower to challenge them - someone who is not afraid to, in British terms at least, be "rude" to their subjects and see if they can really defend assertions that are otherwise allowed to stand as truth. At one point, Wright tries to stand up to Hutcherson - who comes across as a bully, with "illegal immigrants" the perfect, self-serving target - but it's the unfairest of fights.

Yes, some things said here are extraordinary - but only to the ears of those who are already on side. Without going further, the BBC is doing just what the influencers and ideologues it is condemning do - preaching to the choir and failing to move along the conversation.