Endorsements from Republicans and CEOs won’t help Kamala Harris win | Katrina vanden Heuvel

Kamala Harris and Liz Cheney's campaign event last week in Ripon, Wisconsin, the birthplace of the Republican party, was a dramatic component of Harris's ongoing outreach to Republicans. That outreach, begun under President Joe Biden and continuing even more aggressively under Harris, was made clear in an open letter on Thursday in which two dozen Republican former officials and lawmakers in Wisconsin endorsed Harris and her running mate, the Minnesota governor, Tim Walz.

"We have plenty of policy disagreements with Vice President Harris," the Republicans wrote. "But what we do agree upon is more important. We agree that we cannot afford another four years of the broken promises, election denialism, and chaos of Donald Trump's leadership."

This statement comes after the Harris campaign touted the endorsements of more than 100 former staffers and national security leaders from past Republican administrations, 10 retired military generals and admirals, and more than 90 business leaders including former chairs or CEOs of companies such as UBS, Aetna, Visa, Merck and American Airlines, as well as former high officials like Robert Rubin and Larry Summers.

The Harris campaign seems intent on convincing voters that she is the favored candidate of the bipartisan establishment. One problem with this strategy: voters probably already assume that about Harris. And if they didn't, Trump reminds them regularly, painting her both as the "other" and as part of the establishment that has failed them. The danger: Harris is helping to make his case for him.

Trump's mendacity, duplicity, fraudulence and corruption are well known. So why is the race so close, and why does Trump enjoy such support from working-class voters, not simply white men, but growing numbers of Black people, Hispanics and single women? His poisonous racism and xenophobia surely play a part. But the central theme of his political campaigns since he came down the golden elevator in 2016 has been how working people have been fleeced by an establishment that enriched itself and failed them.

In 2016, Trump's focus was on trade, Nafta, China in the WTO. This year, his focus is on inflation and the cost of living. Even his slanders of immigrants focus on how they are taking jobs from working people, raising the cost of housing, the source of increasing crime, drugs and violence.

And repeatedly, Trump indicts the establishment that has failed them. As he said in the 2016 campaign:

As Jared Abbott, of the Center for Working Class Politics, concluded after a study of Trump's rhetoric in 2016, "Unlike virtually any politician they had ever heard before, Trump not only spoke over and over again to the economic pain felt by so many working-class Americans but also called out the elite culprits by name, something that traditional politicians typically shy away from."

On foreign policy, Trump is similarly openly scornful of the generals and foreign policy "blob" who led us into losing wars, squandering the lives not of their own children, but those of working people. When the generals and national security managers announced their endorsements of Harris, Trump's spokesperson, Steven Cheung, responded: "These are the same people who got our country into endless foreign wars and profited off of them while the American people suffered," followed by the lie that "President Trump is the only president in the modern era not to get our country into any new wars."

Trump's lies, libels and shambling vaudeville rallies simply reinforce his message that he not only isn't part of the establishment, but he's hated by them.

In this election, voters are looking for dramatic change. Polls show that, as Stan Greenberg has reported, only a quarter of battleground voters think the country is headed in the right direction. The overwhelming concern is inflation and the cost of living. The average household grocery bill is 20% higher than in 2020. The costs of necessities - housing, healthcare, childcare, college - seem increasingly out of reach.

More and more voters are clear that a big cause of this is entrenched and corrupt interests - big oil, the drug companies, monopolies, multinationals. Greenberg reports that the percentage of voters with little or no confidence in "big business" is the lowest since the financial crisis of 2008.

Harris has an agenda and a message that can speak to these concerns: cracking down on monopolies, starting with price gouging on groceries. Taking on pharma. A child tax credit, help for new families, help for new homeowners and small businesses paid for by taxes on millionaires and billionaires. Moving forward on rebuilding America and generating good jobs by investing in the growth industries of the coming years.

The contrast with Trump's agenda - of tax cuts for the corporations and the rich, of trade wars and higher costs of goods from across-the-board tariffs, of promising big oil a blank check if they support his campaign - is telling.

But Harris has to prove that she is prepared to take on the powerful interests, dislodge the failed establishment, and force the changes she's begun to talk about. When she arrays her support from the establishment, she doesn't build her credibility, she weakens it. If 90 CEOS stand with her, why believe she's prepared to take them on or tax them? If the generals who led us into one failed war after another are with her, why believe she'll focus on rebuilding America and not on global misadventures?

Rather than gaining media acclaim for joining Liz Cheney in Ripon, she might have been better off walking the (blessedly, short-lived) picket line with striking dockworkers, reinforcing Biden's statement that the companies and executives have enjoyed staggering and record returns, and it's time for the workers to get their fair share.

The mainstream media will broadcast the bipartisan support behind Harris. Those who worked with Trump and now oppose him will find a ready platform. In the little time left before the election, Harris and Walz need to focus on providing a compelling answer to the famous union question: which side are you on? Liz Cheney, Robert Rubin and Mike Pence don't help with that answer.