Trump officials accidentally text Atlantic journalist about military strikes in apparent security breach

The principals in the chat raised various concerns about the timing of the strikes, whether it was prudent to wait, and the security of the operation. Vance's account expressed skepticism about the attack, saying at one point he thought it was a mistake, and at another saying, "I just hate bailing Europe out again," alluding to European trade having far more skin in the game with the Suez Canal than the United States.

The following day, according to Goldberg, Hegseth posted highly sensitive information in the chat with operational details of future strikes. Goldberg said he would not print them, but he claimed an adversary with access to what was written could have harmed U.S. military or intelligence officials abroad. Goldberg said he learned the timing of the Yemen strikes on March 15 from the Signal posts.

"According to the lengthy Hegseth text, the first detonations in Yemen would be felt two hours hence, at 1:45 p.m. eastern time," he wrote. "So I waited in my car in a supermarket parking lot. If this Signal chat was real, I reasoned, Houthi targets would soon be bombed. At about 1:55, I checked X and searched Yemen. Explosions were then being heard across Sanaa, the capital city."

The U.S. airstrikes took out Houthi drone, missile and air defense systems, and Waltz touted them as an "overwhelming response" during an interview on ABC.

The open discussion on a non-secure channel left Goldberg stunned. He said at first he had doubts the group was legitimate given the high-profile names and the significance of the discussion.

"I had very strong doubts that this text group was real, because I could not believe that the national-security leadership of the United States would communicate on Signal about imminent war plans," Goldberg wrote. "I also could not believe that the national security adviser to the president would be so reckless as to include the editor in chief of The Atlantic in such discussions with senior U.S. officials, up to and including the vice president."

"I have never seen a breach quite like this," he added. "It is not uncommon for national-security officials to communicate on Signal. But the app is used primarily for meeting planning and other logistical matters-not for detailed and highly confidential discussions of a pending military action."

"This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain," NSC spokesperson Brian Hughes said. "The thread is a demonstration of the deep and thoughtful policy coordination between senior officials. The ongoing success of the Houthi operation demonstrates that there were no threats to troops or national security."

A representative for Vance, who at another point in the discussion said he thought Trump would be making a mistake with the strikes, said the vice president completely supported Trump's foreign policy.

"The Vice President's first priority is always making sure that the President's advisers are adequately briefing him on the substance of their internal deliberations. Vice President Vance unequivocally supports this administration's foreign policy. The President and the Vice President have had subsequent conversations about this matter and are in complete agreement," said Vance's communications director William Martin.

Trump was asked about the story at the White House on Monday but appeared unbothered, and he took a shot at The Atlantic when asked about its involvement.

"I don't know anything about it. I'm not a big fan of the Atlantic," he told a reporter. "To me, it's a magazine that's going out of business. I think it's not much of a magazine, but I know nothing about it."

"As President Trump said, the attacks on the Houthis have been highly successful and effective. President Trump continues to have the utmost confidence in his national security team, including National Security Advisor Mike Waltz," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said.